Week 4-Discussion posts – coursefighter.com

Week 4-Discussion posts – coursefighter.com

Business Finance – coursefighter.com

Absolutely no plagiarism, must be original and very thorough. Please make sure everything is followed in the question and the grading rubric. Assigned articles are attached, please also use at least one other outside academic resource. Must include in-text citations. No cover page needed but the questions should be separate.

Supporting material: Attached

Question #1:

Is Google right to refuse to issue guidance? Why/why not? (choose one side and defend your position)

Question #2:

In reviewing the multimedia recording of activists and comments on activist activities at shareholder meetings, what is your position on the productiveness of these activists’ initiatives? Do they help or hurt the corporation? (pick only one position and defend it). Use links below!

Please see grading rubric below. This assignment should be at least 5-6 paragraphs long and very thorough. Make sure you integrate real-life applications to support key points.

Case Discussion Rubric (2016)

Case Discussion Rubric (2016)

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Initial Posting

Initial response displays an excellent understanding of the assigned case, the course readings, and the underlying concepts and includes the correct use of relevant terminology. Initial response additionally integrates specific real-life application (current events, work or personal experience, prior coursework, etc.) and/or other peer-reviewed research to support key points. Initial response is clear, concise, and compelling.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics

Entirely free of mechanical errors. These include: grammar, punctuation, spelling, and formatting (font style and size).

coursefighter.com